- The "if it saves even one life" argument - What utter hogwash. You want to save "even one life?" Drop the speed limit to 20 MPH for every road everywhere. You'll save tens of thousands of them. But at the end of the day, it is not about saving lives, is it?
- The "we need to protect our children" argument - If it were about protecting the kids, why would there not be guards at schools already? But no. Here we stand, nearly a month after Sandy Hook, and nothing has been done to make schools significantly more safe. Instead, we get a lot of political platitudes, and we wait for the next massacre to occur.
- The "high capacity magazines and assault rifle control" argument - What folly. Exactly what kind of guns are killing a majority of the people in the US? Handguns. Now, the tough question: exactly who is it that is using those guns? The bottom line is that the vast majority of our gun deaths are inner-city killings done by gangs and criminals. New York did something about it (albeit to the detriment of the 4th Amendment, but that is a separate rant) and their murder rates have fallen appreciably. Chicago has done nothing but pass gun legislation after gun legislation, and they have become the murder capital of the nation.
Hunters and common citizens are not killing people in this country. Hardened criminals are.
Let's get real here: the outcome of additional gun laws will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to take lawful action. It will do nothing to curb the criminal element. Gun violence will continue, and additional calls for more "control" will continue as well, and the cycle will continue.
But that's by design. The anti-gun argument isn't about saving lives, or the children, or controlling just one segment of firearms. It is about disassembling the 2nd Amendment, brick by brick. Not wanting to waste a good crisis, that is exactly what some folks intend to do.
And they're more than happy to leave our kids exposed to ensure that it happens.

